My Role

Tools

AuditUX is a collaborative SaaS platform that streamlines website auditing for designers, developers, and clients. Born out of stakeholder interviews and usability testing, the product addresses the pain points of misaligned feedback and fragmented workflows. With intuitive project setup, task assignment, and real-time commenting, AuditUX creates a single source of truth for cross-functional teams, reducing rework and accelerating delivery.

  • UX Designer & Researcher - Led interviews, usability tests, and prototypes to align user, business, and technical goals.

  • Figma → Wireframes, prototypes, and flows for usability testing.

  • Balsamiq → Quick mockups to ideate early UI options.

  • Zoom/Google Meet → User interviews and remote usability sessions.

  • Notion/Docs → Research synthesis, interview notes, and design documentation.

  • A/B Testing & Feedback Loops → Used to validate design decisions and iterate.

The Challenge

Audit processes were fragmented between designers, developers, and clients, leading to misaligned expectations, redundant feedback cycles, and slow project delivery.

Audit UX enhances website design by conducting audits to identify issues like typography, scalability, broken links, and outdated content. This improves SEO and site ranking. The platform fills a gap by helping designers, developers, and project managers collaborate more effectively, offering a CI/CD tool to streamline communication and manage web redesigns efficiently.

SaaS Solution

Streamlined AI


01.

02.

03.

Analytics

Version Control

Design System

Using AI streamlined the creation of screen designs and user flows by automating repetitive tasks, generating design iterations quickly, and offering intelligent recommendations based on best practices. Tools like Claude.Ai, UX Pilot, and ChatGPT enabled rapid prototyping, improved decision-making, and enhanced collaboration, allowing the team to focus on refiing user experiences and meeting project goals efficiently.

Research

Why are Designers and Developers using several tools for the same purpose?

Data sources are outdated and do not refresh enough. Impossible to make relevant and timely conclusions from the service’s analytics.
— Moz User

Supported Features: Collaborative, Content Analysis, Timeline Benchmark

Supported Features: Collaborative, Task Management, Content Analysis, SEO Performance, Page Speed, Broken Links

Supported Features: Collaborative, Task Management, Content Analysis, SEO Performance, Page Speed, Broken Links

Supported Features: Content Analysis, Accessibility Analysis, Broken Links

Links are not getting updated in their database. They are not able to crawl backlinks and are unable to detect internal links.
— Lighthouse User

Design: FIgma, Canva Audit: Google Analytics, Inspect Tools Features: CI/Pipeline integration

Users average 2-3 design tools Most users use a single auditing tool User 5 uses the most auditing tools (3) Feature requests are mostly singular Only user 2 requested multiple features


50% of participants shared that real time collaboration amongst team members and task tracking were the top most useful tools, especially for managing a project.

60% of participants mentioned a delay in the product market release due to ‘requirements gathering’ or continual project scope modification.

40% of participants desired to have a view of their team members screens in tandem with their own to ensure a coordinated design.

50% of participants agreed to using several auditing tools for one project that then needed to be exported and shared with clients.

Feature Support Comparison

Market Gaps

Prioritization Matrix

UX Check

Moz

Lighthouse

Web Developer

Popular Tools

Practices

Based on competitive analysis research, design teams typically use several tools primarily for auditing, as well as, design and team management, due to missing features.

However, a team of designers using several tools potentially leads to a disconnect in timeline, budget and design.

Design teams are unintentionally finding the market gaps in design and auditing tools.

How might a shared design board help team members create a coordinated design?

The option to work in tandem with other designers and developers will give team members the opportunity to view, respond, fix errors, and add to their teams work, Improving team role understanding.

How might an all in one auditing tool increase team productivity?

Real time chat feature as well as a shared design board will help design teams create a consistent redesign while showing the client their progress.

How might creating a collaborative design software with real time communication and task tracking help enhance team member progress?

An in depth auditing tool that sends simplified and clear reports to clients will increase client and stakeholder understanding, reducing risk of late release due to client modification.

Ideate

Information Architecture

After completing the research and identifying a few MVPs, I began sketching ideas on paper divided into eight sections. By dedicating one minute to each section, I was able to quickly generate a variety of ideas and solutions for my Audit UX.

Design Process

Before diving into the design, I wanted to focus on the approaches of other SaaS companies with similarly compounded systems to see how they accommodated their users. I also focused on designing variations of user interface tailored to different devices, specifically for tablet and desktop.

My Role

UX/UI Designer UX Researcher

Tools

Figma Otter.ai UX Pilot.ai Claude.ai

Timeline

3 Weeks

Planning and Scope

After several interviews, I defined the product of Audit UX, prioritizing features that balanced user and business goals, bridging the gap between designers, developers, and clients.

Consumer Ideation

I interviewed a product manager, two designers, two developers, and a graphic designer to gather insights and translate them into features that address user practices and motivations.

After several meetings, I created a foundation and prototypes to share my vision, design principles, and content strategy, which helped structure and guide decision-making.

Strategy

Prototype

AI Tools

How might we address the unique pain points of designers, developers, and project leads during redesigns?

HMW

FINAL REFLECTION

Audit UX was a deeply personal project, focused on redefining website redesign by centering on design teams as the primary users. My goal was to address the pain points of designers, developers, and project leads while streamlining the costly, time-consuming redesign process. Prioritizing responsive design, I conceptualized an innovative meta-SaaS tool to simplify cross-platform adaptation.

Leveraging AI increased efficiency, reducing project time by 75%. It accelerated ideation, optimized user flows, and enabled rapid prototyping, allowing me to tackle complex design challenges within an 80-hour timeframe. Though time constraints limited testing with a larger participant pool, I gained valuable insights into team processes for successful redesigns.

In the future, tools like Maze for unmoderated usability testing could enhance analytics and task flow insights. This project also marked my first integration of subject matter experts before user testing—a practice I plan to expand for even greater impact in future endeavors.

Previous
Previous

Tails

Next
Next

Stryker